Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hank Marquis
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hank Marquis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails general notability guidelines and WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. I don't see any significant coverage about Hank Marquis himself by reliable sources EvergreenFir (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The references that I saw don’t even mention about this businessmen and are unreliable sources. I can easily see how this article fails both WP:GNG and WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. --Vaco98 (talk) 21:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete an overly promotional article on a non-notable consultant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't seem to meet WP:NAUTHOR either. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails to meet our notability requirements. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Promotional content present, lacks notability. Timetraveller80 (talk) 09:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.